16:00:11 <achow101> #startmeeting 
16:00:11 <corebot`> achow101: Meeting started at 2025-10-09T16:00+0000
16:00:12 <corebot`> achow101: Current chairs: achow101
16:00:13 <corebot`> achow101: Useful commands: #action #info #idea #link #topic #motion #vote #close #endmeeting
16:00:14 <corebot`> achow101: See also: https://hcoop-meetbot.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
16:00:15 <corebot`> achow101: Participants should now identify themselves with '#here' or with an alias like '#here FirstLast'
16:00:21 <achow101> #bitcoin -core-dev Meeting: abubakarsadiq achow101 _aj_ ajonas b10c brunoerg cfields darosior dergoegge fanquake fjahr furszy gleb glozow hebasto hodlinator instagibbs jarolrod jonatack josibake kanzure laanwj LarryRuane lightlike luke-jr maflcko marcofleon maxedw Murch pinheadmz provoostenator ryanofsky sdaftuar S3RK stickies-v sipa sr_gi tdb3 theStack TheCharlatan vasild willcl-ark
16:00:23 <hodlinator> hi
16:00:23 <stickies-v> hi
16:00:27 <brunoerg> hi
16:00:28 <janb84> hi
16:00:29 <sipa> hi
16:00:31 <pinheadmz> 🥑
16:00:31 <maxedw> hi
16:00:45 <lightlike> Hi
16:00:49 <achow101> There are no pre-proposed meeting topics this week. Any last minute ones to add?
16:00:53 <eugenesiegel> hi
16:00:53 <willcl-ark> hi
16:01:30 <TheCharlatan> hi
16:01:50 <glozow> hi
16:01:54 <achow101> #topic Kernel WG Update (TheCharlatan)
16:02:06 <TheCharlatan> Review has been coming in on #30595, which is great to see. So far this has not triggered any additional major changes.
16:02:10 <corebot`> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30595 | kernel: Introduce initial C header API by TheCharlatan · Pull Request #30595 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
16:02:11 <lightlike> hi
16:02:27 <cfields_> hi
16:02:38 <TheCharlatan> Also got some more people to test it out for various prototypes, and feedback so far has been positive.
16:03:03 <TheCharlatan> asking for even more people to look at it :)
16:03:06 <TheCharlatan> that's all.
16:04:02 <achow101> #topic Cluster Mempool WG Update (sdaftuar, sipa)
16:04:45 <sipa> Hi.
16:04:52 <kanzure> hi
16:05:27 <sipa> Getting some good review on #33157 (thanks l0rinc and glozow), which I'm addressing, and will push soon. I think it's pretty close otherwise.
16:05:32 <corebot`> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33157 | cluster mempool: control/optimize TxGraph memory usage by sipa · Pull Request #33157 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
16:06:14 <glozow> And then it's #28676?
16:06:19 <corebot`> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28676 | Cluster mempool implementation by sdaftuar · Pull Request #28676 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
16:06:33 <sipa> sdaftuar and i are doing some more simulation work on figuring out the optimality of block building, and how far off we are; i posted about it on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28676#issuecomment-3362136518, but will post more graphs soon
16:07:03 <sipa> glozow: yeah, though 28676 is rebased on top of 33157 already, and it doesn't really impact the interface, so 28676 can be reviewed fine right now too
16:07:12 <sipa> it doesn't need to actually blocked by it
16:08:29 <sipa> that's it from me
16:08:49 <achow101> #topic MuSig2 WG Update (achow101)
16:09:29 <achow101> #29675 has been getting review which I've been addressing. It's got 3 ACKs now so I think it's probably rfm.
16:09:33 <corebot`> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29675 | wallet: Be able to receive and spend inputs involving MuSig2 aggregate keys by achow101 · Pull Request #29675 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
16:10:02 <achow101> #topic Releases
16:10:39 <achow101> v30.0rc3 is up, and the tag for final is scheduled for tomorrow. Have any new issues been found in testing?
16:11:32 <achow101> 28.3rc1 and 29.2rc2 are also up for testing as well
16:13:08 <achow101> Or any other topics to discuss this week?
16:13:23 <glozow> review nag for #33577
16:13:24 <corebot`> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33577 | Revert "depends: Update URL for `qrencode` package source tarball" by achow101 · Pull Request #33577 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
16:13:26 <cfields> #33577 (and the ones around it) need some quick acks
16:13:27 <corebot`> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33577 | Revert "depends: Update URL for `qrencode` package source tarball" by achow101 · Pull Request #33577 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
16:13:31 <cfields> heh
16:13:33 <glozow> jinx
16:13:34 <sipa> jinx!
16:13:39 <glozow> DOUBLE JINX
16:14:07 <sipa> how critical is #33517 ?
16:14:11 <corebot`> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/33517 | multiprocess: Fix high overhead from message logging by theuni · Pull Request #33517 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
16:15:10 <cfields> given how late things already are, I suppose we should just ship without it.
16:15:22 <achow101> that pr is also currently a draft
16:16:41 <cfields> the overhead was very significant for my bitcoin-p2p binary. Sjors[m]1 would know best how much it affects mining.
16:17:59 <sipa> ok
16:18:17 <achow101> Any other topics to discuss?
16:19:45 <Sjors[m]1> I'm not terribly worried because getting a block template and its header involve tiny messages.
16:20:07 <Sjors[m]1> Getting the full block, for inspection by the pool, is less urgent.
16:21:37 <cfields> Sjors[m]1: well the client side is fixed by bumping libmp. But I suppose the same is true of the messages sent/received on the Core side?
16:22:23 <cfields> (I have no idea how chatty/poll-y either side is)
16:24:52 <Sjors[m]1> cfields: not very chatty, waitNext() doesn't poll, it blocks
16:25:09 <cfields> ok, good to know. thanks.
16:25:47 <achow101> Anything else to discuss?
16:28:09 <achow101> #endmeeting