14:00:16 <achow101> #startmeeting 14:00:18 <sdaftuar> hi 14:00:19 <maxedw> hi 14:00:21 <ajonas> hi 14:00:26 <achow101> #bitcoin -core-dev Meeting: achow101 _aj_ amiti ariard aureleoules b10c BlueMatt brunoerg cfields darosior dergoegge dongcarl fanquake fjahr furszy gleb glozow hebasto instagibbs jamesob jarolrod jonatack josibake kallewoof kanzure kouloumos kvaciral laanwj LarryRuane lightlike luke-jr MacroFake Murch phantomcircuit pinheadmz promag provoostenator ryanofsky sdaftuar S3RK stickies-v sipa theStack TheCharlatan vasild 14:00:29 <hebasto> hi 14:00:30 <dergoegge> hi 14:00:34 <TheCharlatan> hi 14:00:34 <brunoerg> hi 14:00:34 <darosior> hi 14:00:35 <cfields> hi 14:00:38 <sr_gi[m]> hi 14:00:38 <achow101> There is one preproposed meeting topic this week. Any last minute ones to add? 14:00:40 <laanwj> hii 14:00:55 <Murch[m]> hi 14:01:16 <lightlike> Hi 14:01:19 <achow101> #topic 28.0 priority projects 14:01:25 <josie> hi 14:01:29 <achow101> Nominations are now closed, vote in #29465 14:01:31 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29465 | Voting on Priority Projects for 28.0 ÷ Issue #29465 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 14:01:32 <sipa> hi 14:02:01 <achow101> #topic Ad-hoc high priority for review 14:02:05 <achow101> Anything to add or remove from https://github.com/orgs/bitcoin/projects/1/views/4 14:02:35 <achow101> going to remove #27231 since it needs rebase 14:02:38 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27231 | Fix logging RPC and -debugexclude with 0/none values, add test coverage, improve docs by jonatack ÷ Pull Request #27231 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 14:02:46 <furszy> hi 14:03:27 <laanwj> dad 14:03:33 <laanwj> eh nm 14:03:35 <fjahr> hi 14:03:40 <abubakarsadiq> hi 14:03:45 <achow101> #topic Bitcoin Core contributor survey (ajonas) 14:03:48 <furszy> probably #28574. To solve https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28037#issuecomment-1952211224. 14:03:50 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28574 | wallet: optimize migration process, batch db transactions by furszy ÷ Pull Request #28574 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 14:03:53 <ajonas> hi 14:04:06 <ajonas> I've written up a summary of this year's Bitcoin Core dev contributor survey at https://adamjonas.com/bitcoin/coredev/retro/coredev-2023-retro/ 14:04:17 <ajonas> Thanks to those who took the time to fill it out and I'll be back to send you pleas to fill out the next one in ~11 months 14:04:39 <ajonas> that's all 14:04:52 <bitcoin-git> [qa-assets] murchandamus opened pull request #170: Add initial seeds for CoinGrinder targets (main...2024-02-coingrinder-initial-seeds) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets/pull/170 14:05:11 <achow101> Anything else to discuss this week? 14:05:25 <sdaftuar> i have a question about feature freeze and v3 deployment 14:05:56 <achow101> #topic feature freeze question (sdaftuar) 14:06:24 <sdaftuar> so when v3 was merged, we did it without actually making v3 transactions standard, so that the essential part of the rules could go in while we await feedback on parameters 14:07:04 <sdaftuar> i just wanted to get a sense of where we are in the release cycle, should i presume that it's too late now for this release to get that turned on as standard at this point? 14:07:19 <achow101> have we gotten any feedback on parameters? 14:07:34 <sdaftuar> not precisely -- i have a thought on how to deal with that though 14:07:42 <sdaftuar> but maybe not worth pursuing if it's clearly just too late 14:08:10 <glozow> were we also thinking about the "imbue-only" route? 14:08:52 <sdaftuar> glozow: i think imbued 3 is weird enough that we should only do it with affirmative acks from the affected projects, which I'm guessing we won't get for this release cycle 14:09:38 <achow101> branching is scheduled for a week and a half from now (i guess we're doing a longer feature freeze?) 14:10:19 <achow101> but I think it might be too late to go in, we're well past feature freeze at this point 14:10:50 <sdaftuar> ok, makes sense 14:10:59 <sdaftuar> thank you! 14:11:32 <achow101> Any other topics? 14:13:15 <darosior> Is it too late to ask for a 26.1 backport? 14:13:26 <glozow> darosior: what do you have in mind? 14:13:30 <darosior> #28784 fixes a regression which would be nice to have in 26.1 14:13:33 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28784 | rpc: keep `.cookie` file if it was not generated by romanz ÷ Pull Request #28784 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 14:13:41 <achow101> bugfixes are allowed 14:13:53 <darosior> Not critical, just annoying for downstream applications managing a bitcoind 14:14:40 <darosior> Alright i'll open a backport PR and see where it goes. 14:14:56 <glozow> seems fine 14:16:32 <achow101> #endmeeting