14:00:13 <achow101> #startmeeting 14:00:14 <provoostenator> hi 14:00:15 <Murch> Hoi 14:00:19 <TheCharlatan> hi 14:00:22 <b10c> hi 14:00:28 <hebasto> hi 14:00:28 <josie> hi 14:00:36 <luke-jr> hi 14:00:45 <fjahr> hi 14:00:45 <instagibbs> hi 14:00:46 <glozow> hi 14:00:48 <RubenSomsen> hi 14:00:51 <achow101> #bitcoin -core-dev Meeting: achow101 _aj_ amiti ariard aureleoules b10c BlueMatt brunoerg cfields darosior dergoegge dongcarl fanquake fjahr furszy gleb glozow hebasto instagibbs jamesob jarolrod jonatack josibake kallewoof kanzure kouloumos kvaciral laanwj LarryRuane lightlike luke-jr MacroFake Murch phantomcircuit pinheadmz promag provoostenator ryanofsky sdaftuar S3RK stickies-v sipa theStack TheCharlatan vasild 14:01:00 <lightlike> hi 14:01:01 <furszy> hi 14:01:11 <dergoegge> hi 14:01:15 <achow101> There is one pre-proposed meeting topic this week. any other last minute topics to add to the list? 14:01:38 <achow101> #topic package relay updates (glozow) 14:02:26 <jamesob> hi 14:02:26 <glozow> Just opened #28251 which fixes a bug instagibbs found. rebased #25038 on top of it and in the process of rebasing #26711 on it 14:02:28 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28251 | validation: avoid mempool eviction mid-package evaluation by glozow ÷ Pull Request #28251 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 14:02:30 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25038 | policy: nVersion=3 and Package RBF by glozow ÷ Pull Request #25038 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 14:02:35 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26711 | validate package transactions with their in-package ancestor sets by glozow ÷ Pull Request #26711 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 14:03:18 <glozow> #28199 is the pr to review for p2p changes. has a couple acks so that's nice 14:03:20 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28199 | test: tx orphan handling by glozow ÷ Pull Request #28199 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 14:03:31 <achow101> should be able to get that in soon 14:03:46 <glozow> after that's merged I'll open another small one to change mempool/txrelay logging to include wtxid, not just txid. 14:03:50 <brunoerg> hi 14:04:00 <glozow> also working on rearchitecting #28031 with dergoegge 14:04:03 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28031 | Package Relay 1/3: Introduce TxPackageTracker as Orphan Resolution Module by glozow ÷ Pull Request #28031 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 14:04:39 <glozow> I have lots of PRs based on top of each other, sorry if it's a bit messy. 14:04:59 <achow101> can you update the tracking issue with them all? 14:05:13 <dergoegge> just mention it in the tracking issue and keep anything non-prio as draft? 14:05:14 <glozow> yes 14:05:54 <achow101> #topic BIP 324 updates (sipa) 14:06:08 <achow101> I think sipa is not here today 14:06:34 <achow101> but the ciphersuite pr was merged earlier today, so I think we're on to p2p stuff now 14:06:59 <achow101> #28165 probably 14:07:01 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28165 | net: transport abstraction by sipa ÷ Pull Request #28165 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 14:07:22 <achow101> #topic libbitcoinkernel updates (TheCharlatan) 14:08:31 <TheCharlatan> No changes to the priority PR this week. 14:09:03 <achow101> i guess we should all just review that 14:09:16 <achow101> #topic assumeutxo updates (jamesob) 14:09:22 <TheCharlatan> stickies-v left a nice review on it (27866) though and managed the reproduce some of the block flushing misbehavior. 14:09:39 <jamesob> sdaftuar's PR was merged (woohoo) and the big guy #27596 is fully up to date 14:09:41 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27596 | assumeutxo (2) by jamesob ÷ Pull Request #27596 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 14:10:12 <provoostenator> Will take it for a spin soon, probably next week. 14:10:41 <achow101> nice, looked like a rough rebase, hopefully the last one that'll be necessary 14:11:00 <jamesob> I'm sure there'll be more rebases, but hopefully none so involved :D 14:11:43 <achow101> #topic Ad-hoc high priority for review 14:11:57 <fjahr> I would like #27581 please 14:11:59 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27581 | net: Continuous ASMap health check by fjahr ÷ Pull Request #27581 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 14:12:00 <achow101> Anything to add or remove from https://github.com/orgs/bitcoin/projects/1/views/4 14:12:07 <provoostenator> Maybe #28244 ? 14:12:09 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28244 | Break up script/standard.{h/cpp} by achow101 ÷ Pull Request #28244 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 14:12:46 <achow101> fjahr: provoostenator: added 14:14:03 <achow101> #topic GitHub metadata backup and mirror - https://mirror.b10c.me 14:14:25 <b10c> just wanted to mention that I'm backing up and mirroring (to test the backups) the issues and pull-requests of some Bitcoin Core related repos on https://mirror.b10c.me 14:14:25 <b10c> currently bitcoin/bitcoin, bitcoin/bips, bitcoin-core/secp256k1, bitcoin-core/gui, but will consider other repos with important comments if there are requests 14:14:25 <b10c> i think it's valuable to preserve the development history. Not sure how likely it is that GitHub will kick us off, though. 14:14:25 <b10c> i see this as tangential to the current efforts of spinning up a self-hosted, hot-spare GitLab instance. But hot-spare != backup. 14:14:25 <b10c> the mirror is also available as an onion service: http://e3y5vky4v7snefqyhbn6kcmyl5fo4cnk3a2irh2ttvwua46ww5ubl6qd.onion/ 14:14:26 <b10c> happy to help others to set this or something similar up. 14:15:14 <fanquake> could add qa-assets, probably worth retaining the commentary there 14:15:34 <luke-jr> I thought we already had something like this 14:15:53 <achow101> https://github.com/zw/bitcoin-gh-meta is one that has been going for a while 14:15:56 <fanquake> not run by anyone in the project 14:15:57 <b10c> luke-jr: there is https://github.com/zw/bitcoin-gh-meta 14:16:05 <fanquake> and afaik that one actually misses comments 14:16:05 <b10c> but it's missing review comments 14:16:18 <luke-jr> i c 14:16:29 <b10c> also not sure who zw is 14:16:44 <fjahr> jamesob also had a script but not sure if he is still running it 14:16:53 <TheCharlatan> very nice b10c. 14:17:09 <achow101> a browsable website is also nice 14:17:18 <fjahr> but i don't think it an interface for browsing 14:18:12 <achow101> any other topics to discuss? 14:18:34 <jamesob> fjahr: haven't run that script in a while 14:19:00 <jamesob> (but for posterity, it's here: https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin-github-scrape) 14:20:12 <achow101> #endmeeting