14:00:26 <achow101> #startmeeting 14:00:29 <jamesob> hi 14:00:29 <josie> hi 14:00:31 <provoostenator> hi 14:00:33 <pinheadmz> hi 14:00:34 <achow101> #bitcoin -core-dev Meeting: achow101 _aj_ amiti ariard aureleoules b10c BlueMatt brunoerg cfields darosior dergoegge dongcarl fanquake fjahr furszy gleb glozow hebasto instagibbs jamesob jarolrod jonatack josibake kallewoof kanzure kouloumos kvaciral laanwj LarryRuane lightlike luke-jr MacroFake Murch phantomcircuit pinheadmz promag provoostenator ryanofsky sdaftuar S3RK stickies-v sipa theStack TheCharlatan vasild 14:00:42 <luke-jr> hi 14:00:43 <brunoerg> hi 14:00:48 <stickies-v> hi 14:00:50 <kanzure> hi 14:00:54 <dergoegge> hi 14:00:54 <lightlike> Hi 14:00:54 <_aj_> hi 14:00:59 <emzy> hi 14:01:00 <furszy> hi 14:01:04 <achow101> There are no pre-prosed meeting topics this week. any last minute ones to add to the list? 14:01:48 <Murch> Hi 14:02:06 <instagibbs> hi 14:02:18 <achow101> #topic assumeutxo updates (jamesob) 14:02:21 <jamesob> Same as last week; #27746 by sdaftuar is the priority to review. I'll be rebasing the big PR on that once he rebases the fix-ups in. But I think that branch is looking in very good shape and seems to have healthy review, so whatever we need to do to get that over the line would be good. 14:02:26 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27746 | Rework validation logic for assumeutxo by sdaftuar ÷ Pull Request #27746 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 14:02:59 <jamesob> The substance of #27596 hasn't changed, though, so if people want to test that I certainly encourage them to 14:03:00 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27596 | assumeutxo (2) by jamesob ÷ Pull Request #27596 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 14:03:53 <jamesob> (the big PR is already rebased on an earlier version of sdaftuar's changes) 14:04:14 <achow101> 27746 has been getting quite a bit of review recently, so hopefully we can get that in soon 14:04:42 <achow101> #topic package relay updates (glozow) 14:05:01 <theStack> hi 14:05:01 <fanquake> she is away today afaik 14:05:34 <achow101> it looks like #26711 is still the priority and has been getting review 14:05:39 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26711 | validate package transactions with their in-package ancestor sets by glozow ÷ Pull Request #26711 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 14:05:42 <sipa> Hi. 14:05:43 <instagibbs> last week's discussion has put the package validation PR back into draft, unsure what her latest thinking is 14:06:07 <instagibbs> mostly on avoiding DoS, IIRC 14:06:29 <darosior> (hi) 14:06:32 <achow101> cool, at least there's some progress 14:06:34 <achow101> #topic BIP 324 updates (sipa) 14:06:50 <sipa> libsecp256k1 PR with elligatorswift was merged yesterday 14:07:09 <sipa> I've rebased my current PR to integrate elligatorswift in Bitcoin Core, and it's getting reviews. 14:07:22 <achow101> #27479 ? 14:07:24 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27479 | BIP324: ElligatorSwift integrations by sipa ÷ Pull Request #27479 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 14:07:32 <instagibbs> yes 14:07:35 <sipa> Once there is a new libsecp256k1 release, I'll open a PR to update to that separately from 27479, yes. 14:07:58 <achow101> looks like that might go in soon as well 14:08:19 <achow101> #topic libbitcoinkernel updates (TheCharlatan) 14:09:37 <jamesob> sipa: congrats 14:10:07 <fanquake> Do we actually need to wait for a libsecp256k1 release? 14:10:11 <achow101> it looks like all of the libbitcoinkernl PRs have been getting review, current priority of #27862 seems to be close to making it in 14:10:13 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27862 | validation: Stricter assumeutxo error handling when renaming chainstates by ryanofsky ÷ Pull Request #27862 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 14:11:15 <sipa> fanquake: Not necessarily, but unless there is a rush to merge 27479 (or it somehow prevents it being reviewed), I don't think it matters that much. 14:11:48 <fanquake> sipa: no rush, but if it's not going to happen until september, that seems like kinda pointless waiting for us, given we don't care about bumped version numbers etc 14:11:54 <jamesob> achow101: I'll be looking at the Russ PR today 14:12:19 <fanquake> i.e next milestone is https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/milestone/4?closed=1, "due by sept 1st" 14:12:54 <sipa> We may do another one earlier. 14:13:50 <achow101> #topic Ad-hoc high priority for review 14:14:02 <luke-jr> "due by" != "waiting until" :P 14:14:04 <achow101> anything to add or remove from https://github.com/orgs/bitcoin/projects/1/views/4 14:14:49 <achow101> or any other topics to discuss? 14:14:59 <jon_atack> hi 14:15:34 <jon_atack> just now see the bugfix column in that dashboard; https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27231 could perhaps be moved from blocker to bugfix 14:16:21 <achow101> jon_atack: done 14:17:24 <jon_atack> thanks! happy to trade reviews with anyone for one on that pull. it's been "ready" since some time. 14:18:15 <achow101> #endmeeting