19:02:28 <achow101> #startmeeting 19:02:29 <core-meetingbot> Meeting started Thu Dec 1 19:02:28 2022 UTC. The chair is achow101. Information about MeetBot at https://bitcoin.jonasschnelli.ch/ircmeetings. 19:02:29 <core-meetingbot> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick 19:02:35 <hebasto> hi 19:02:39 <CoinForensics> hi 19:02:55 <achow101> #bitcoin -core-dev Meeting: achow101 _aj_ amiti ariard b10c BlueMatt cfields Chris_Stewart_5 darosior digi_james dongcarl elichai2 emilengler fanquake fjahr gleb glozow gmaxwell gwillen hebasto instagibbs jamesob jarolrod jb55 jeremyrubin jl2012 jnewbery jonasschnelli jonatack jtimon kallewoof kanzure kvaciral laanwj larryruane lightlike luke-jr maaku marcofalke meshcollider michagogo moneyball morcos nehan NicolasDorier paveljanik petertodd 19:02:55 <achow101> phantomcircuit promag provoostenator ryanofsky sdaftuar sipa vasild 19:03:27 <sipa> hi 19:03:34 <b10c> hi 19:03:48 <achow101> Welcome to the weekly general IRC meeting. There is one pre-proposed meeting topic. Are there any last minute topics to add to the list? 19:04:37 <MacroFake> hi 19:04:51 <lightlike> hi 19:05:12 <achow101> let's start with the usual 19:05:13 <achow101> #topic High priority for review 19:05:13 <core-meetingbot> topic: High priority for review 19:05:20 <achow101> Anything to add/remove/merge? 19:05:30 <achow101> https://github.com/orgs/bitcoin/projects/1 19:07:19 <achow101> seems not 19:07:27 <b10c> looking for Concept (N)Acks on #26593 19:07:30 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26593 | tracing: Only prepare tracepoint arguments when actually tracing by 0xB10C ÷ Pull Request #26593 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 19:08:24 <achow101> b10c: added to chasing conecept ack 19:08:45 <b10c> thanks! 19:08:56 <achow101> #topic concept/wip/review/rfm project board (#26556) (_aj_) 19:08:56 <core-meetingbot> topic: concept/wip/review/rfm project board (#26556) (_aj_) 19:08:57 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26556 | [meta] Distinguish concept/wip/review/rfm for active/high-priority PRs? ÷ Issue #26556 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 19:08:57 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26556 | [meta] Distinguish concept/wip/review/rfm for active/high-priority PRs? ÷ Issue #26556 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 19:10:11 <lightlike> achow101: could remove #26359, which was merged 19:10:14 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/26359 | p2p: Erlay support signaling follow-ups by naumenkogs ÷ Pull Request #26359 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 19:11:05 <achow101> lightlike: done 19:11:22 <achow101> is _aj_ here to discuss his topic? 19:13:23 <achow101> doesn't seem like it, so let's punt that to next week 19:13:32 <achow101> does anyone else have anything to discuss? 19:13:50 <CoinForensics> I had a question about a @bitcoincore email. 19:14:20 <achow101> CoinForensics: go ahead 19:14:27 <CoinForensics> Since a couple of years, I've been "fighting" with antivirus vendors to remove the false positives on the binaries. I track the progress on the Bitcoin Client VirusTotal Tracker https://bitcoinissafe.com. 19:14:27 <CoinForensics> 24.0 is already much better but still some false positives. I'm now trying to get Bitcoin Core accepted into all the AV specific whitelisting programs but get mostly rejected because of missing affiliation or company email address.. 19:14:27 <CoinForensics> Would it be possible to get a @bitcoincore.org mail to show my "affiliation"? 19:14:41 <achow101> #topic bitcoincore.org email (CoinForensics) 19:14:41 <core-meetingbot> topic: bitcoincore.org email (CoinForensics) 19:15:34 <kanzure> can anyone submit bitcoin core? 19:15:44 <achow101> I'm not sure who runs the mail server, might need to ask BlueMatt[m] 19:15:59 <CoinForensics> kanzure: You can submit the binaries with each release 19:16:01 <BlueMatt[m]> there is no mail server on bitcoincore.org 19:16:20 <kanzure> why not have multiple ecosystem companies submit some binaries? 19:16:28 <BlueMatt[m]> BYO-SMTP 19:16:50 <achow101> BlueMatt[m]: how do we receive emails to the security list? 19:17:05 <BlueMatt[m]> there's a receive side thing routed through gandi 19:17:12 <BlueMatt[m]> but i dont think there's anything set up to _send_ 19:17:21 <BlueMatt[m]> maybe the gandi account can 19:17:26 <kanzure> security goes through gandi? 19:17:30 <BlueMatt[m]> but dont think I've ever seen it done? oh, maybe I have 19:17:32 <BlueMatt[m]> but I dont have access 19:17:33 <kanzure> (i guess this doens't matter because encryption) 19:17:43 <BlueMatt[m]> BlueMatt[m]: `dig bitcoincore.org mx` :) 19:18:14 <achow101> CoinForensics: do you need to be able to send from that email? 19:18:32 <CoinForensics> Yes, only the sending would be the interesting part. 19:18:39 <CoinForensics> Then I have to check for an other solution. 19:18:49 <BlueMatt[m]> oh, right, we have a blanket dmarc reject 19:18:59 <BlueMatt[m]> cause some spammers like to send from @bitcoincore.org to tell people to download malicious software 19:19:16 <BlueMatt[m]> you'll have to check with the gandi account owner 19:19:35 <sipa> is that wumpus? 19:19:39 <BlueMatt[m]> I believe so 19:20:18 <CoinForensics> Ok thank you. Then I will contact him. Or look for something simpler. 19:20:36 <CoinForensics> Don't like changing the dmarc if nobody sends from this domain. 19:20:53 <CoinForensics> Thank you 19:21:07 <achow101> any other topics today? 19:22:42 <achow101> #endmeeting