19:00:00 <laanwj> #startmeeting 19:00:01 <core-meetingbot> Meeting started Thu May 19 19:00:00 2022 UTC. The chair is laanwj. Information about MeetBot at https://bitcoin.jonasschnelli.ch/ircmeetings. 19:00:01 <core-meetingbot> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick 19:00:33 <hebasto> hi 19:00:35 <jonatack> hi 19:00:39 <laanwj> hebasto: i was interested to see what they actually did to solve it (e.g. make it a choice, remove boost::Filesystem completely, etc) but... i don't really get it 19:00:46 <kvaciral> hi 19:00:46 <laanwj> #bitcoin -core-dev Meeting: achow101 _aj_ amiti ariard b10c BlueMatt cfields Chris_Stewart_5 darosior digi_james dongcarl elichai2 emilengler fanquake fjahr gleb glozow gmaxwell gwillen hebasto instagibbs jamesob jarolrod jb55 jeremyrubin jl2012 jnewbery jonasschnelli jonatack jtimon kallewoof kanzure kvaciral laanwj larryruane lightlike luke-jr maaku marcofalke meshcollider michagogo 19:00:47 <lightlike> hi 19:00:48 <laanwj> moneyball morcos nehan NicolasDorier paveljanik petertodd phantomcircuit promag provoostenator ryanofsky sdaftuar sipa vasild 19:00:50 <achow101> hi 19:00:57 <sipa> hi 19:01:25 <kanzure> hi 19:01:26 <laanwj> hi! 19:01:48 <_aj_> hi 19:01:49 <ariard> yo 19:01:50 <laanwj> looks like there have been no topics proposed in advance this week (you can propose meeting topics with #proposedmeetingtopic <topic> during any time of the week) 19:02:25 <laanwj> any last minute topics? 19:03:13 <instagibbs> hi 19:04:15 <b10c> hi 19:04:36 <laanwj> then let's begin with the usual 19:04:40 <laanwj> #topic High priority for review 19:04:40 <core-meetingbot> topic: High priority for review 19:05:02 <laanwj> there's currently 12 blockers and 2 chasing concept ACK in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/8 19:05:18 <laanwj> anything to add or remove? 19:05:25 <cfields> hi 19:05:33 <Murch> hi 19:05:52 <laanwj> or is anything on the list almost ready for merge? 19:06:35 <ariard> i think gleb is still happy to get more reviews on #23443 19:06:43 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23443 | p2p: Erlay support signaling by naumenkogs ÷ Pull Request #23443 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 19:07:36 <laanwj> imo it'd be good to have some more eyes on #22702, it's had quite a bit of review and testing, the comments have been addresed, i think it's more or less ready to go 19:07:38 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22702 | Add allocator for node based containers by martinus ÷ Pull Request #22702 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 19:08:25 <jonatack> laanwj: i've been running that branch as well (rebased to master), need to re-review it 19:08:40 <laanwj> jonatack: thanks! 19:10:46 <laanwj> ariard: yes, it's had quite a lot of review and ACKs, but looks like it has an unaddressed comment by jonatack 19:11:54 <laanwj> (and a discussion about include-what-you-use by jnewbery and glozow) 19:11:56 <jonatack> ariard: been chatting offline with gleb about review, those comments were only initial, i plan to review that child pull soon too 19:12:53 <laanwj> though i'm not sure that' s something that holds up the PR 19:13:08 <ariard> jonatack: ah nice, yeah wasn't sure if it holds up the PR 19:13:20 <laanwj> right 19:13:31 <ariard> i'll ping him for the comments, meetings are usually late for him 19:13:53 <laanwj> ariard: thank you! 19:14:46 <laanwj> anything else for high priority? any other topics? 19:15:34 <laanwj> i think #23595 is close too 19:15:36 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23595 | util: Add ParseHex () helper by MarcoFalke ÷ Pull Request #23595 ÷ bitcoin/bitcoin ÷ GitHub 19:16:16 <laanwj> there's some higher level discussion about updating the developer guide when to use std::byte but that doesn't have to hold up the PR 19:16:32 <laanwj> i don't think the change itself is controversial 19:18:05 <laanwj> if no one has further topics that concludes the meeting, thanks everyone for attending, see you next week 19:18:08 <laanwj> #endmeeting