{
  "founder": "sipa",
  "channel": "#bitcoin-core-dev",
  "network": "freenode",
  "id": "bf6e6fbd8c5b4f6d81bf96fc318d909a",
  "name": "#bitcoin-core-dev",
  "chair": "sipa",
  "chairs": [
    "sipa"
  ],
  "nicks": {
    "sipa": 60,
    "lightningbot": 2,
    "kanzure": 25,
    "btcdrak": 14,
    "cfields_": 4,
    "CodeShark": 9,
    "wumpus": 37,
    "jcorgan": 1,
    "sdaftuar": 16,
    "luke-jr": 6,
    "achow101": 1,
    "gmaxwell": 5,
    "instagibbs": 3,
    "petertodd": 5,
    "jonasschnelli": 1
  },
  "start_time": "2016-05-26T19:06:07+00:00",
  "end_time": "2016-05-26T19:52:53+00:00",
  "active": false,
  "original_topic": "Bitcoin Core development discussion and commit log | This is the channel for developing Bitcoin Core. Feel free to watch, but please take commentary and usage questions to #bitcoin | Channel logs: https://botbot.me/freenode/bitcoin-core-dev, http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/",
  "current_topic": "child pay for parent",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "e3e47d9f762b4ad6b14d58d4b94e78e8",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "#startmeeting",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:06:07+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "a1a74d29f0e54f9180410b6b4ac48e53",
      "sender": "lightningbot",
      "payload": "Meeting started Thu May 26 19:06:07 2016 UTC.  The chair is sipa. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:06:07+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "2dffa19abe74487dbaf0907d0bc27295",
      "sender": "lightningbot",
      "payload": "Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:06:07+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "7907dc92473444fc8432a5195377a435",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "yay",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:06:11+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "e74033f83ac641498ac3d0596370001f",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "topics?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:06:13+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "5ca2dc22724c4ac6a2302b87ae503705",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "zurich transcript coming soon",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:06:16+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "6a32f562a268444791bc860744321142",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "sipa was wardialing",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:06:17+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "32a734855be54b05af75bd8ec25d412f",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "kanzure: I can push it now if you like",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:06:32+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "be5dec11abbd4c5e93ed9732802b9233",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "we can copy-paste topics from zurich for follow-up",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:06:35+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "6f72073d16334a7a99b78db652a80a05",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "btcdrak: sure let's do that",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:06:40+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "607437263cab4a80b663bc75d7ee6a08",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "i have a topic: segwit vs netrefactor",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:07:12+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "e6ca55d5a03f4b5bb1e6e34f0edd878d",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "i believe the conclusion from zurich was that sipa promised everyone tree sigs and poly sigs within 4 days",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:07:27+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "d8df848ec7b84ea08fd6d76af5589144",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "kanzure: zurich meeting notes https://bitcoincore.org/logs/2016-05-zurich-meeting-notes.txt",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:07:40+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "933c07702ab74e4c8f36f767b1ad92f4",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "ouch no anchor links. well, okay.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:08:02+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "672c520b9e114b688db66ee64ae312bb",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "btw i heard from someone that they were surprised that libconsensus refactoring was considered lower priority than segwit",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:08:31+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "c7d0ee3af4534c22bea6a6b811b240d3",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "just some interesting feedback.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:08:37+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "ca4b67d38e7c43e6ac3a3f03c9f5130c",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "kanzure: could be arranged.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:08:42+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "bb0c1bce888d4e209f6c9d6e8eb96d74",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "sipa: ack",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:08:51+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "9128458be8b34a4dab71b7d1d15934e2",
      "sender": "cfields_",
      "payload": "sipa: sure. Though i suspect the (my, anyway) answer will be \"segwit comes first, hands-down\"",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:09:16+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "15a3f16a691c455396ab5ff3f047b48f",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "cfields_: ok, settled :)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:09:22+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "0cd4b7a626ca4207b520f88dfe074799",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "kanzure: good feedback... i think it's mostly that segwit has much more buy-in as a roadmap (but i'm biased here)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:09:44+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "120c132685c14902a583854c48d1bbfd",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "was that even a question. segwit first.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:09:45+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "444b5052bccf4280994a1e88e4e1369e",
      "sender": "cfields_",
      "payload": "sipa: for sure. I'm working on it in parallel, but I have no desire to slow segwit down for it in any way",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:10:15+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "b6214720c07f48b9b63299c6bc1721e0",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "right, right. it's more of a long-term note--- but eventually we will have to bite the bullet and absorb the pain of the refactor impacting everyone's branches.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:10:21+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "5246b439e64e4828b37ae8f72f240f56",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "libconsensus is strategically at least as important as segwit - but the coordination issues required are considerable",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:10:21+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "bf59f0b5360a48deaf9a4ae4cc519093",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "what do segwit and net refactor compete on?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:10:32+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "99ff9a682c704a4098db113580ee6fec",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "wumpus: code :)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:10:37+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "fafbc2392d7d43798803d2de0f8da163",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "which parts? does net refactor give you significantly more trouble rebasing?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:10:56+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "c8f3ae7c8cbe49a3aac5c85f27b1e8aa",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "also, libconsensus isn't as glitsy :)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:10:59+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "a99bfc7c278d4f4bbb8348cd6c80a7bb",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "probably not",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:11:01+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "eb49fb339f5245a58d8ad2664605318f",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "what is the status of net refactor things?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:11:11+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "0eb730db9e8541f2b4d4e0fdab17254e",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "where does compact blocks fit in?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:11:28+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "a59724f4dedb44b5be0e3895191ba5c2",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "libconsensus refactoring worked well in the 0.10 window, because it seemed there was a clear goal (getting script exposed) and a clear way to do it... further refactors seem to be more one-person shows (not that i blame those people, but if we want them to happen, i think we'll need to agree on a plan beforehand)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:11:30+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "0bb8e78798e64d4e90f70965cfbcd755",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "well I can understand how libconsensus conflicts with segwit",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:11:41+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "58cd1a2028a14e36bb29c34e4fa0d025",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "wasn't aware of previous concerns about libconsensus plan synchronization, good to know",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:11:57+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "77cbc1ec354d4c9ca056a79c07ea5fdc",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "libconsensus conflicts with everything :)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:12:01+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "0ed02cace5b04719a27e789c40e02e7f",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "there's also some network changes for segwit, but they're at a message level",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:12:18+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "dff7e24a8d7048b09000b42bcdd1ca16",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "whereas cfields' network refactor is at a lower level",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:12:29+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "9a4f2c783cc14c228bed0893eaf01c90",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "yeah, network refactor probably hurts compact blocks more than it hurts segwit",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:12:40+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "b80fe7654d744cfca93353b532c03327",
      "sender": "cfields_",
      "payload": "kanzure: see #8085. I addressed wumpus's notes from Zurich, but that made it rough to read. I'm working on another version of the same thing with a clean history, done by tomorrow for sure",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:12:40+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "c3094f6dccf54eda9b6ef64fbe4b4b1a",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "as much as it pains me to sacrifice on architecture, I think holding up segwit right now is much more costly in terms of the public's goodwill",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:12:47+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "ed19639c60cf436c8ea651b655f777c3",
      "sender": "jcorgan",
      "payload": "+1",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:13:31+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "976141fb19a044959743bf38a5d4c1b7",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "I agree progress in the protocol is more important, I think segwit even affects the proposed libconsensus API",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:13:39+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "8011c9af486f4f4483cd1c05a9e6e718",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "worse, it affects the current libconsensus API :)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:13:52+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "74da8de1961e45febca9d408ef8d1970",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "ok, other topics?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:14:21+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "15dde60898884a649a2939bbfe9154cb",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "i have a few more",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:14:37+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "82f65a86aab54a1fa651b23c5a1ed357",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "CPFP will also need to go in at some point, and also conflicts with many in-flight things",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:14:55+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "447ea5a70db643a38f0275c6eab21be5",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "and a whole range of relay improvement",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:15:06+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "57e652c34ac0410ca410d2c7982b7ab3",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "libconsensus feels more like some checkbox people want checked than something that will actually have a lot of users but feel free to prove me wrong",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:15:08+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "251622e760d349dda8e45fb774d9f6d5",
      "sender": "sdaftuar",
      "payload": "if we think segwit will be backported to 0.12, then probably CPFP should wait until afterward?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:15:29+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "8973bb99a8dc41e091363a43f3887edd",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "it should be done but unless someone has a clear example of an application using it and contributes to it it has not much priority",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:15:35+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "888d26704cf74dea8dfe8e42756e8973",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "when i talk about libconsensus i mean \"abstracting out consensus logic\"... not so much an actual API exposure",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:15:41+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "c59aedec967b4f758e9e7aa356b9c781",
      "sender": "sdaftuar",
      "payload": "to avoid dealing with the CNB refactor in 0.12",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:15:42+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "3ab27bb9334c4a3f8c0d2e6ea328814a",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "sipa: that's what I mean right, I'm not sure other people talkinga bout it mean the same thing",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:16:35+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "0a31fe040d744ccd922f0847b4030c3b",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "at some point it becomes just a buzzword... :)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:16:50+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "eeee96b67952410897062991624262b5",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "maybe i should formulate the question this way: segwit, compact blocks, CPFP... all for 0.13?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:16:51+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "1c707d525cea442886022758027de8bf",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "that's a bit much",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:16:59+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "226ba8d5f10b405d95a88451ae1a53aa",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "for just before the feature freeze",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:17:18+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "30c9f2b7453442e885c7ea729ca23fbf",
      "sender": "sdaftuar",
      "payload": "sipa: yes!",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:17:42+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "72d0742ee3e04c52a471b46d66d3d128",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "(2016-06-16)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:17:50+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "31f139dd20f64651b89190f88b7eb8a4",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "i would very much like to have at least compact blocks in before segwit, to alleviate the extra relay latency",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:18:13+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "6e73dec56e9b430382a54822b58df3a9",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "I don't think we should make a habit of merging such big things just before a release",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:18:21+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "e9e1a0be24404890b24a4d5b426265fa",
      "sender": "sdaftuar",
      "payload": "segwit is clearly the heaviest lift here to review...  i think the otherw two things can be knocked out very quickly",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:18:48+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "2d3229ef937e469d8ed09a200fe07bf5",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "segwit is obvious",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:18:55+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "502125199fc947d5bff659b6a5dc61ac",
      "sender": "sdaftuar",
      "payload": "but that's the thing where it's not clear to me if it'll be sufficiently reviewed by 6/16",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:19:07+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "16f5e9d6bbce49e59c432e78b3cd88b8",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "yes that'st he thing what counts",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:19:17+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "a41d08729ad6410685f0558d6516869f",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "compact blocks would be good in 0.13",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:19:46+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "b21a76b870b7411bacab7b9fee78bea1",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "segwit should be merged soon so that we can do 0.12.1 before 0.13",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:19:57+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "1d31e1c915394242be8dccce07d59257",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "on that topic...",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:20:03+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "c1ed8d290f0b455782c7cd3b1df7556c",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "we can merge segwit with no softfork defined for it on mainnet",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:20:30+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "049b619f5c624b6da6125dc0457901e6",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "we've already moved the release for 0.13 with a month so I'd really like to not move it again",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:20:51+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "4d176aad21c145feb5a76a605fa3caf8",
      "sender": "sdaftuar",
      "payload": "sipa: interesting!  i hadn't considered that",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:20:53+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "4d10b043bd304341adf7ef86f914f36a",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "sipa: indeed!",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:20:57+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "be29b9d83ac540b4872d8052de8ad3e6",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "and even once we do add the segwit softfork we can disable mining on it until release",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:21:14+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "010dcfe916a84351b197a5894c0ee54d",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "#idea merge segwit without defined softfork",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:21:15+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "0a8d18500c5b48f1a88f8b31e2266d20",
      "sender": "cfields_",
      "payload": "hmm",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:21:35+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "912227c174c74ac2aa1187ba61f7ef58",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "sure",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:22:12+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "acf5d102fc0043ba9229cee017589ad9",
      "sender": "sdaftuar",
      "payload": "i guess the thing to worry about is if we have testing gaps, things might break without anyone noticing?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:22:22+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "2d5a0b23b4bd4783893f0273f8471fab",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "just to have the code in?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:22:23+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "c48b04a34224414092c009e581cf2c06",
      "sender": "luke-jr",
      "payload": "need vb gbt before segwit tho..? maybe not if left undefined, unsure",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:22:30+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "04e98fd17f0b4e61b6fc0acab25efdcd",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "luke-jr: yup",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:22:37+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "345628ae031b4e9b95a962c8a2cd7c33",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "luke-jr: will look at that",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:22:42+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "a77f535312204786aefd75b1e7b239e0",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "sdaftuar: well the tests need to cover it",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:23:13+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "9cf353ee7abd4091902d95deb0673cc2",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "if there's a testing gap it should not be merged in any case",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:23:30+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "8834f88ef8b74d13a7393370f5c10354",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "all the segwit tests use regtest",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:23:31+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "5827f4cb939343bb82810fdb0198af56",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "right",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:23:37+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "9c6bb37450ed41abbf7eb73918384c4f",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "for that it doesn't matter whether a softfork is defined on mainnet",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:23:52+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "3b675920755347b885d17cbba5e2cde5",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "indeed",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:24:01+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "f7184e2ee647426880ee9e3d4fd245cd",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "and for script/tx tests, the softfork is not relevant",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:24:11+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "4f131c430f2c41728912e6e18f77886b",
      "sender": "luke-jr",
      "payload": "sipa: should I look into merging vbgbt w segwit?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:24:16+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "4b5b319ff9c647bd9b1e4ea6f9792dad",
      "sender": "achow101",
      "payload": "what benefit would there be to not define the softfork when mergin segwit",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:24:19+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "88d48c2fba974030b6fb496710a6ab0c",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "achow101: segwit conflicts with a lot of code, having it in would simplify further development on the branch",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:24:48+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "37f560cee7504c7fb064bc441856568f",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "sipa: we should merge without mainnet, because it will allow people to test on testnet now (it's already been activated in testnet).",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:24:51+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "7dd6eba7271b434b9582853272dc36c8",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "achow101: to have the code in, so that development happens on top",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:24:53+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "19e6ef8d6ce74314a06a13362e986c80",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "achow101: and so that people acn use it on the regtest/testnet network",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:25:08+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "1e85dab8018f49dc967c9ff559aa5460",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "btcdrak: another good reason, indeed",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:25:12+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "a76e1b800d1b468ea61e2f8e72016edf",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "btw: should we keep the segnet?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:25:27+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "bd363dead97f43198aae06085f18903a",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "no, i want to drop it",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:25:35+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "543ef32f78394deda8a53e7721b67071",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "wumpus: no segnet should go",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:25:38+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "505e458e553d4176b5716b870eaf93ce",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "unless there is a good reason to keep it",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:25:42+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "6cffd0c7abaf40069f6b69ef93decc4b",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "ok",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:25:43+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "b18c01eb35a644d5bac9524cb48e14e6",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "(no opinion either way just wondering whether that's supposed to end up in master)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:25:54+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "9e034498d39b464ea367765f546d6b4d",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "sipa: there's no need to drop it in merge to master right away imo, but certainly before we add parameters to mainnet.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:26:12+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "4a2d9cc01c1247d4b8eeb73cd3b02cae",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "yes as it has been triggered on testnet",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:26:14+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "333967a9dc8b4d43b038285a7cc5e51b",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "i will prioritize the testnet dns seed filtering, vb/gbt changes, and doing another batch",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:26:39+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "ce5761a4fb32431a9a0357a0ef36fe02",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "merging segwit without activation might lessen the pressure on reviewers",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:26:49+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "1a2c4beaea6b4abaa431bdecd06f3a65",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "which might be a negative side effect",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:26:54+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "7d076c8b8d9d4decad40e48ec08d5cc9",
      "sender": "sdaftuar",
      "payload": "kanzure: agree",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:26:59+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "4d9d3cd07dbc4775b7111aa228af676e",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "anyhow if the segnet network helps testing I don't have problems with temporarily having it in master, as long as it is clearly communicated that people shouldn't rely on it",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:27:32+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "a39bba35866d4acc9d2c67a363892504",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "i wasn't planning on including it in master",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:27:54+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "5cc7c7177fc943cd9ab7da255abb4106",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "well playing psychological meta-tricks on reviewers doesn't play much of a role imo, we should do whatever is practical",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:28:09+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "f11c589621d340448ae34ba85bbe6e9a",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "if merging segwit helps make progress on other fronts so that 0.13 can be a better release",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:28:42+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "b8634a5049074211863e0f5a96e2bd4f",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "we should do that",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:28:44+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "24c792e51f2d4826a569ac5f8f9fc972",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "also having it merged in master usually means it gets more testing and review, not less",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:29:10+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "8f129de2e89f4e6b9afe701345fdff5a",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "i'll do one more batch, and if there are some ACKs then, i'll squash",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:29:12+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "435e361707774ecda735dd82a7576bd7",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "so it would be active in testnet segnet and regtest when merged, but not mainnet, and letting others maintain segwit for other 0.13 changes?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:29:30+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "f8e451ad97674a649c5813d1d8c2f3cf",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "kanzure: don't understand the last part",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:29:49+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "ecf951aeeb3e48279e666e374d7e390f",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "if there are changes necessary to the code post-merge but pre-release, they can just go in master",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:30:04+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "4d5cd44c6a774204b7cdef4a71ee4194",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "the ideal of merging soon is to let others maintain segwit for possibly conflicting 0.13 changes?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:30:04+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "26461d66ef8741529d894ac5ac9e1914",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "there's not *that* much time left for 0.13, it's good to decide now what we still want to have in and focus on that",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:30:20+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "73ed4f9888cc48ae9fc5b585954cdc0d",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "kanzure: to let others rebase their own patches on top",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:30:31+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "fab81f35ff4740378917922de6d0879a",
      "sender": "wumpus",
      "payload": "well not 'maintain segwit' but work on top, yes",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:30:45+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "4ebecb66944e440eb1eccfd9d1af68f9",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "kanzure: the only difference is not having activation params on mainnet. it would really help by not holding up other work.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:30:57+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "249567c2d5d64189961f0077f30d14d2",
      "sender": "sdaftuar",
      "payload": "sipa: would you still plan to backport to 0.12?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:31:23+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "4340e9ab84ea47a99d4d4383fae63ff6",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "sdaftuar: yes, but after merge in master",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:31:30+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "b9d7d015d2cb4ec89643d97acce10d07",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "(but before defining activation)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:31:40+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "daf156b33b7e42a5b4e904e45988f34f",
      "sender": "sdaftuar",
      "payload": "ok",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:31:42+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "8177494a24954935914c13cc4e9b4315",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "ok, other topics?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:32:05+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "b85c2cc4fe2645389927d1655cc1111a",
      "sender": "gmaxwell",
      "payload": "The non-merged status of segwit has kinda been holding up other work, unfortunately.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:32:10+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "0c0c9d3ad72f430bb6e2d7c72492fc5e",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "maybe bip151 things?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:32:46+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "5a37d3a2999b463fbf86c33f83f3e6be",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "status bip151: waiting for implementation",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:33:11+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "139d5c751cb2472a8ab5d7567bc36160",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "i'd say :)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:33:13+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "6882c0244f0e48deb71766dcee764458",
      "sender": "instagibbs",
      "payload": "sdaftuar, is that list of testing gaps public somewhere?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:33:19+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "cc84976beb4844f1b216d3446689ab49",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "ok",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:33:22+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "ea3ab943b86a4cc8881460c6aa6f98d5",
      "sender": "instagibbs",
      "payload": "(sorry, backtracking)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:33:24+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "2435ca0afe0d43f8b9132c172508ad3c",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "https://gist.github.com/sdaftuar/0469a2583f33989cf8196d2f26d99114",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:33:39+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "4494e79603c64d0e99985c0fc386b8e5",
      "sender": "sdaftuar",
      "payload": "instagibbs: yes, now :)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:33:48+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "1eaef68c5ac846089578895b787450a9",
      "sender": "luke-jr",
      "payload": "lol",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:34:07+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "4eec02c6ddf5452cbda9f34ffff09425",
      "sender": "instagibbs",
      "payload": "not really my meaning, but ok ;P",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:34:15+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "265681fc005f483bb16809be163450df",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "re: bip151, I mentioned it today at the conf I was at to some cryptographers, and their response to it not being an off the shelf standard was horror :) might be a pr issue",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:34:40+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "72f6b1acbe8b41498e4bb700299e8585",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "petertodd: it's openssh's chacha20-poly1305 exactly",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:35:02+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "1d939ce23e5549bdaedcb72103645cad",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "were they horrified about the current implementation at all",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:35:07+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "854c2439f883414aba54d2c6e15e8305",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "sipa: good, we should make that 110% clear then",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:35:38+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "45ea38935839465f81ea406a129f82b3",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "petertodd: maybe that needs to be made more clear",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:35:39+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "2a0ca67864d04ee78200abc847814f7b",
      "sender": "gmaxwell",
      "payload": "it's pretty clear in the BIP now, I thought.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:35:48+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "3196cc358aef403d810d1dbf8f5e2f5f",
      "sender": "gmaxwell",
      "payload": "maybe it could be moved up to the top.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:35:57+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "cad29a8fcdcf4e26b7315b71c19e04ae",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "gmaxwell: yeah, move it to the top - I just looked at it and didn't see that",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:36:16+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "1e40baab313f4d608b2698bb9c787b31",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "#action jonasschnelli make it more clean that bip151 uses openssh's chacha20-poly1305 standard",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:36:45+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "8557907444c44ed793e03db3f4679e14",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "ok make that an action point for the logs",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:36:46+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "e0571c4e49294af6bf0b515f6ae31b80",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "jinx",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:36:56+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "b28846c6122e4f68a369fcc4958142a4",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "make it clear that the standard *describes* a subset of openssh's standard, and that bitcoin's use of it is identical and can reuse the existing code",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:37:27+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "c780a60aa7fe43a9b08b1d66b312e4a5",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "pus or minus licensing issues?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:37:39+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "3b33be1fb6ac426898f92afae07156b9",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "*plus",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:37:43+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "53992b6a34b742d9b7870de0dfc02b8e",
      "sender": "jonasschnelli",
      "payload": "Ack. Will do",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:38:16+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "2662153065a546a79aef870fcd4e72af",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "kanzure: https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/blob/05855bf2ce7d5cd0a6db18bc0b4214ed5ef7516d/LICENCE <- looks like BSD at least, no GPL code",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:38:26+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "209cb746ed134774b9881b01a8215ae9",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "the actual cipher is public domain code",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:38:47+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "55f0fe40926e4424ac907115ed242025",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "the glue into openssh is BSD",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:38:51+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "b94c5fc926754103a6e861de45004432",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "petertodd: thanks for checking",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:41:18+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "42b9e47b1c2b4c44a5e98b9c2a3dfb9c",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "anything else?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:42:09+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "9a565c81bc8f4302b1b50c5792b21249",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "(mental note: type #topic next time)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:42:18+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "652644cd0b68415285d3d626f92e4dba",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "no just #topic",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:42:41+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "e9f4d334d5394ed79e0794585dae1b92",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "child-pays-for-parent?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:42:46+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "261b82cab0c5499ea7878278a1274cbf",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "and wasn't there something activating soon that we were looking at",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:43:07+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "af4b2589c17c454b9d41e5b70135a616",
      "sender": "sdaftuar",
      "payload": "happy to talk about CPFP, are there any questions?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:43:28+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "45b7524bafde45688919bffb673ce376",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "#topic child pay for parent",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:43:33+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "e91216b89c704fb1b9d1d0dc1fc3c2f0",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "i think the blocker is just the refactor for CNB",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:44:05+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "933604f9ff1e4730810821b6af82efb9",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "which will conflict with segwit",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:44:15+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "d4f058e4122444c0a3bba863d8fac5e6",
      "sender": "sdaftuar",
      "payload": "right",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:44:40+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "a25141b7d05e4b869d2cf5fc6e23c069",
      "sender": "luke-jr",
      "payload": "so maybe target 0.14",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:45:00+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "3fe4b527deec465f9560ba208a342b09",
      "sender": "luke-jr",
      "payload": "?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:45:04+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "456711c562ce4543be5703e32126b3da",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "at the latest, i'd say",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:45:23+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "af20831d988d41c48c0325a81b362c78",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "oh i forgot about the testing infrastructure stuff for sdaftuar",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:45:30+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "612b85b201854837943e09edcf2bf2d0",
      "sender": "kanzure",
      "payload": "sdaftuar: something i mentioned in person a few days ago, https://www.terraform.io/",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:45:35+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "524f120f3ed24882824ec0d640f1844d",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "but yes, it may miss 0.13",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:45:37+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "e84f1c58c22e46f39f7d98e2b1728dd7",
      "sender": "sdaftuar",
      "payload": "i will be sad if it is necessary to push it back that far",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:45:37+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "eca25832e088433b9cd7a1eb3c6e89f0",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "me too",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:45:45+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "77dffffe962e4ab8bea80d5d095f176d",
      "sender": "sdaftuar",
      "payload": "has anyone tried to test or review #7600?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:46:25+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "8c12df509bb24b8da2cf1e171c079be6",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "i started looking at it, but not in detail",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:47:13+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "c7f8b85d6152417285bd7a70adb64cc2",
      "sender": "sdaftuar",
      "payload": "alright, well no point in talking about blockers until it's been reviewed",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:47:53+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "a1949a5d1d9f4e71a45ae735dd690141",
      "sender": "gmaxwell",
      "payload": "I beleive I applied it to a node and started it. (but then switched out of it to test something else) It's on my list.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:48:04+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "9b35ffc0342046578ee1cd3c85777d4a",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "other topics?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:50:11+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "3b8e38a4543b42c68638b070730384b9",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "sipa: your suggestion seems superior to 8101 :p",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:50:34+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "ee7b8599ff4349d39e4617c37ff55aad",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "at least for now",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:50:38+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "5080ef048de144f99c2f804a063e0170",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "I was going to bring that up...but perhaps we can defer that discussion",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:50:50+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "30ec9e7d30ff4620b015f911fe13fe80",
      "sender": "luke-jr",
      "payload": "sdaftuar: I'll be sad too: it's been waiting since like 0.4 :p",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:50:50+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "933be8fb45b249459703e5dd525768fd",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "luke-jr: well, feel free to help review/test 7600 already",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:51:38+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "aef969747c8544ea8708b26b2f8205c1",
      "sender": "gmaxwell",
      "payload": "I will be sad to not get CPFP in soon if that happens, especially considering all the work that it's taken to get it this far.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:51:46+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "78f66f055f854d1aba40083a658419db",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "so i would encourage people to review",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:52:10+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "3775321050ae405c83af5c0ca3b83be8",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "#endmeeting",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:52:53+00:00"
    }
  ],
  "events": [
    {
      "event_type": "START_MEETING",
      "message": {
        "id": "e3e47d9f762b4ad6b14d58d4b94e78e8",
        "sender": "sipa",
        "payload": "#startmeeting",
        "action": false,
        "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:06:07+00:00"
      },
      "operand": null,
      "id": "e3e47d9f762b4ad6b14d58d4b94e78e8",
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:06:07+00:00"
    },
    {
      "event_type": "IDEA",
      "message": {
        "id": "010dcfe916a84351b197a5894c0ee54d",
        "sender": "sipa",
        "payload": "#idea merge segwit without defined softfork",
        "action": false,
        "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:21:15+00:00"
      },
      "operand": "merge segwit without defined softfork",
      "id": "010dcfe916a84351b197a5894c0ee54d",
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:21:15+00:00"
    },
    {
      "event_type": "LINK",
      "message": {
        "id": "2435ca0afe0d43f8b9132c172508ad3c",
        "sender": "kanzure",
        "payload": "https://gist.github.com/sdaftuar/0469a2583f33989cf8196d2f26d99114",
        "action": false,
        "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:33:39+00:00"
      },
      "operand": "https://gist.github.com/sdaftuar/0469a2583f33989cf8196d2f26d99114",
      "id": "2435ca0afe0d43f8b9132c172508ad3c",
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:33:39+00:00"
    },
    {
      "event_type": "ACTION",
      "message": {
        "id": "1e40baab313f4d608b2698bb9c787b31",
        "sender": "sipa",
        "payload": "#action jonasschnelli make it more clean that bip151 uses openssh's chacha20-poly1305 standard",
        "action": false,
        "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:36:45+00:00"
      },
      "operand": "jonasschnelli make it more clean that bip151 uses openssh's chacha20-poly1305 standard",
      "id": "1e40baab313f4d608b2698bb9c787b31",
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:36:45+00:00"
    },
    {
      "event_type": "TOPIC",
      "message": {
        "id": "45b7524bafde45688919bffb673ce376",
        "sender": "sipa",
        "payload": "#topic child pay for parent",
        "action": false,
        "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:43:33+00:00"
      },
      "operand": "child pay for parent",
      "id": "45b7524bafde45688919bffb673ce376",
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:43:33+00:00"
    },
    {
      "event_type": "END_MEETING",
      "message": {
        "id": "3775321050ae405c83af5c0ca3b83be8",
        "sender": "sipa",
        "payload": "#endmeeting",
        "action": false,
        "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:52:53+00:00"
      },
      "operand": null,
      "id": "3775321050ae405c83af5c0ca3b83be8",
      "timestamp": "2016-05-26T19:52:53+00:00"
    }
  ],
  "aliases": {},
  "vote_in_progress": false,
  "motion_index": null
}