{
  "founder": "btcdrak",
  "channel": "bitcoin-dev",
  "network": "freenode",
  "id": "2ea75d991b7047a087d6339fb6197882",
  "name": "bitcoin-dev",
  "chair": "btcdrak",
  "chairs": [
    "btcdrak"
  ],
  "nicks": {
    "btcdrak": 43,
    "lightningbot": 2,
    "petertodd": 42,
    "CodeShark": 16,
    "Luke-Jr": 18,
    "sipa": 9,
    "jtimon": 4
  },
  "start_time": "2015-11-26T19:24:40+00:00",
  "end_time": "2015-11-26T20:00:24+00:00",
  "active": false,
  "original_topic": null,
  "current_topic": "RBF",
  "messages": [
    {
      "id": "4f7cd5474cdf458c92416d541a61ae45",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "#startmeeting",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:24:40+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "da33b987d60d471895ddbf22d38740c6",
      "sender": "lightningbot",
      "payload": "Meeting started Thu Nov 26 19:24:40 2015 UTC.  The chair is btcdrak. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:24:40+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "4fc28f0636aa41debad7870be510edbd",
      "sender": "lightningbot",
      "payload": "Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:24:40+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "8c1460fec95c4738930a9406639e2808",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "#topic CLTV activation",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:24:58+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "698a5c299cc8496b862ea1c4d04fff28",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "petertodd: the floor is yours",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:25:06+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "998c1cf1ced8437c9655853f6ee6c914",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "right, so it's plausible that we'll have CLTV activate within just a few weeks, as everyone but a few big players has adopted it",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:25:17+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "9bdc292ab40c44529f188343d5c9bbbc",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "we've got about 20% of nodes running CLTV-supporting bitcoin core versions... we should do another redit/twitter/etc. push reminding people that they should upgrade to v0.11.2 / v0.10.4",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:26:03+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "e2ba06bfea094c5495d3b855972a29f0",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "Yes, I was planning to do something today but got sidetracked and forgot. Best to do on Monday/Tuesday for best coverage.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:26:44+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "0435ce2c6b114b20be530975c303d01f",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "btcdrak: sounds like a plan",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:26:55+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "8035f32e09394fa0a3668a6f0e91b930",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "it will be fun doing an mSIGNA release that supports CLTV :)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:27:56+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "04024954e13247fb9356c1ba560275ae",
      "sender": "Luke-Jr",
      "payload": "petertodd: well, negative effect of not upgrading for non-miners is just degraded validation, right?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:27:59+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "5b550f6b47d74ac8a5aa03c416dfd512",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "Luke-Jr: yes, reduced to SPV",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:28:15+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "ba3b4c67df644cd590db8589212a99c1",
      "sender": "Luke-Jr",
      "payload": "k",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:28:31+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "f0f4f0c5447c44678f9b4a54e1515d5c",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "Luke-Jr: we do not kick peers for sending us a now-invalid nVersion=3 blocks, so the network won't split or anything",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:28:38+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "6f51aa5862d640089f015b176b01e10e",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "#action Post reminder about CLTV deployment next week on social media",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:28:39+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "bfa221fbca834d5c8f543f72b5985346",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "is this topic concluded?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:29:48+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "441d63d3b5ae4c74ab95bcdab0a85e20",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "I think so",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:29:52+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "69f744f32b5d42babfc618f5b9f9a6ef",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "ok well I have one :)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:30:05+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "123a1014b69145c38c18551675b8af8f",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "shoot",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:30:13+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "097f166c24504f97899833aa4854b689",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "#topic BIP68/BIP112 implementation",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:30:21+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "dd5104c0311d45629be1a0704ff16312",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "in retrospect we should have kept the nSequence semantics but still called the opcode OP_RCHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY and use the proper semantics for that ;)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:31:12+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "024a8e004cdb4efeb4878a8ae157343f",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "So reporting from last week, the BIP68 and BIP112 texts have been updated to match the implementations",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:31:15+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "08201ce766ac4ebaa5d9c6ce7ee26274",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "I've done a bit of work on CSV demo's, but that's getting pushed behind scaling bitcoin conf prep: https://github.com/petertodd/csv-demos",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:31:28+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "8c219faeb27e453f8edda3da48d8415f",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "btcdrak: yeah, new texts look better",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:31:49+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "e19065374d1a49c0b785aaf84a9548dd",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "I would like to note the implementations are as agreed back in October. The BIP texts have has some peer review and received ACKs.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:31:56+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "3985c13451e347dc806a012ae6742bd1",
      "sender": "Luke-Jr",
      "payload": "CodeShark: never too late to rename..",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:32:00+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "2cebc8de79c14ca4a0cd9b0d62fa34ce",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "#link BIP68 text https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/245",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:32:13+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "915e492728f04385a889c0fdfbcc398d",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "#link BIP112 text https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/248",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:32:27+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "9fa8f434aed3470286ab0e42cbade218",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "I vote we let btcdrak pick a new bikeshed color^H^H^H new name",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:32:30+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "31c9d0f2a49c4527a7128bf08be842ea",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "lol",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:32:48+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "69a51b95826349e693b8492f3c56ebe2",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "Regarding the implementations PRs #6312 (BIP68) and #6564 (CSV opcode BIP112), these are up to date and ready. They have also received a number of ACKs",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:33:14+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "c301ffe036ad42fa9d6461ef45cdfbd7",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "I posted to the list about renaming OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:33:48+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "745fbe46fa7b4d92be49d177d3da3fc3",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "btcdrak: I'm definitely holding off an ACK until I've seen some worked out demos of CSV functionality",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:33:50+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "39ea387c9c9b4298ae2e4290758a05af",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "#link http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-November/011801.html",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:33:51+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "b03af822045c49d4999e56ae3e09d0ff",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "yeah, the only thing that is holding me back from ACKing is that I haven't actually tried constructing CSV transactions",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:34:41+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "38fe65cb4f0e435e87c10dc565d64afc",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "I believe these PRs should be merged soon. For the avoidance of doubt, these are mempool-only implementations, with no softfork deployment code. That should be added later when we are ready to deploy",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:35:29+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "6505172ed8034a22882513367bcc47b8",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "it's worth noting that if it were easier to add fields to transactions, this whole review process would be much easier",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:35:37+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "02b83443ee094cfda22e9e93c0f2d13b",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "petertodd: working on it!",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:35:58+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "a952b610767c4bf28baf33c59a5a108b",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": ":)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:35:59+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "241d9dfdea5445fa9d0b16f060b335fa",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "segwit might fix that, PT",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:35:59+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "7c5a475ec2ff4aa5abc181211a474c72",
      "sender": "Luke-Jr",
      "payload": "sipa: hah, I was thinking just that",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:36:11+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "2a54777329344d05b38ac0cdf74204ba",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "sipa: yes, I was thinking about segwit when I said that :)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:36:14+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "491e504eb863429faa6710df332e6ade",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "in the end it might turn out that we don't even need the nSequence field ;)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:36:41+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "7d492c97a1e64691a3100a290d2cd579",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "sipa: though if I understood your code, you haven't yet made tx hashing be oer a tree yet",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:36:47+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "97cb9315155c47979ff55ff98192932b",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "So we can never have enough review, I can never say the PRs are ready, but, since there has been a lot of ACKs and we're not merging a consensus change, I really want to ask for #6312 and #6564 to get merged",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:36:56+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "923a8c27c67d4e0fbdc23d73cd961d36",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "petertodd: i changed that",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:36:59+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "9bc256bce5994530be4845748ce27d07",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "petertodd: though it's still broken",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:37:13+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "86340038fe814525a276a81f233d2bc7",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "So that's my monologue done.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:37:29+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "146576a9df6c4218be171a5578736ef5",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "btcdrak: so, I'd suggest you write out in the pull-req what exactly is your plan for handling a change to the rules after it's merged - in a dev branch I don't think that's a big deal, but if we release a mempool-only version that can be ugly",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:37:41+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "5de4b5b99c6a47fc9c3763bf6d1b19d8",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "btcdrak: merging after v0.12.0 is forked off would be safest",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:38:21+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "891ca3b9616e46a0bc0db4a21f80b8bf",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "btcdrak: IIRC that's supposed to happen in about a week or so",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:38:40+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "e79b6ba59a4d403b9de9efebe91019b1",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "petertodd: OK. I'm pretty confident we're not changing the rules, BIP68 has been in the bike-shed long enough and pretty much everyone's requests have been incorporated.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:39:08+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "30313b8031f34b44a2a1a6bb1e5a9e26",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "sipa: we should talk at scaling bitcoin about this; I've done a lot of thinking re: this stuff for my proofchains work",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:39:08+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "88c97541d5774bff872879f683df0556",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "petertodd: sure",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:39:30+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "8ff75ae79ed64689bb3d531192f20f79",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "I actually am presenting on extensibility using segwit",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:39:49+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "57a308b47bd8475583619c333607d4a1",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "I would be happy with it being merged right after 0.12 is branched off. But it really needs to get merged... I cant insist enough",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:39:55+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "85e5ca1198234fc29e17c57f78015d4e",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "although it is not in the program yett",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:39:56+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "d921c08a65a742e196580ea985588198",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "btcdrak: but I asked for the bikeshed to be painted the color of an eldritch horror!",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:39:58+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "cb792b37edcd4e7793dd22eb8d8b38e1",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "CodeShark: cool!",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:40:14+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "47f14cb2c31b414783740589e4a3ac66",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "CodeShark: send me what you have; may be relevant to my presentation",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:40:29+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "8f4e87b19f8f4c35b04e16548d8b0ce5",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "I certainly do want to change the name of the opcode, but that's an easy change",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:40:36+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "8c2ebd1713c84b49a9500787c7f8445b",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "wumpus: sipa: gmaxwell: coments/thoughts?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:41:02+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "1a6ae83c190c4035a765ccb6c812d08c",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "btcdrak: i disagree with the need to be merged... at this point we have to wait anyway",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:41:15+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "f439babd5f524bd8a94032e7b2062974",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "PT: sure - as soon as I have something ;)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:41:34+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "d61c4429bc094a97a05cf57ea7275477",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "btcdrak: not saying that it shouldn't, and i understand that waiting and rebasing is annoying",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:41:38+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "3e00997e48e64e80979a3606519b5093",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "btcdrak: next rebase is on me :)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:41:39+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "707fdb87361e4333abd99fb433193426",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "sipa: with all due respect it's almost 6 months. it's getting painful.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:41:43+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "db89291c2de24414a47cdc7a402d30d3",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "btcdrak: hey, CLTV took a year, two if you count from the initial implementation",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:42:15+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "02291ade884d47ea8c2f0eac1684e57e",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "btcdrak: i completely understand that, but that is not a reason... i have a feeling people only recently started actually looking into it seriously",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:42:16+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "485a49d1e9cd4d62a5694053f63049d2",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "sipa: agreed :(",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:42:24+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "7e1d2cfef281465483b9813432f68b62",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "anyway the remarkable speed that CLTV is being adopted makes me worry less about getting CSV ready in time for things that might use it",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:43:01+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "ceb87638d5c04876b5b5b0a32454f283",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "sipa: fair enough. Can the BIP texts get merged. They are an accurate representation of the current implementations and it's already confused a couple of people who read the version in master not realising it was an old version.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:43:20+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "d28b4359bf7448d384e2137bcc515923",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "btcdrak: +1 on merging BIP texts",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:43:33+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "a7c14e467b47440eb89fc2dca088ed14",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "btcdrak: no reason why the bip texts can't be merged",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:43:44+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "64340c7f5bcb4bbaad45f65484c039a3",
      "sender": "Luke-Jr",
      "payload": "btcdrak: BIP changes should be merged as soon as the author(s) ACK them",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:43:50+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "96cd94a70ac14cf79e761a31959e6c6a",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "even if there are minor amendments to make to the BIP texts it's a heck of a lot better than the current status",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:44:03+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "9dea985df35742c38371a2a17d69433f",
      "sender": "Luke-Jr",
      "payload": "remind me when I get home tonight if that's the case",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:44:10+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "dca0ae0504cb43a2910f2ccfadaae955",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "Luke-Jr: I am the author of BIP112",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:44:15+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "e3b47baab1c54e92a6561313b97e154f",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "Luke-Jr: oh, all authors? we should make that clear in the instructions",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:44:17+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "5799d2c4238442f0a7254c4a8aa6232f",
      "sender": "Luke-Jr",
      "payload": "petertodd: AFAIK just one",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:44:35+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "4739ed3bf1854af89758af464421dd39",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "and really maaku has handed over the proposals to me so it is not reasonable to expect him to ACK BIP68",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:44:44+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "ef298ee73a65492f8b8647cfb6747d54",
      "sender": "Luke-Jr",
      "payload": "but clarifying it would be nice",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:44:51+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "42afefa693df45979321461eb34a2db6",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "btcdrak: can you rebase your BIP112 PR?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:45:09+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "2526dbbfb7ac4a9c877035a8c78c5c3c",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "CodeShark: to what, they all show as mergeable",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:45:57+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "421d2151e10b41e992cff9108b99bc6a",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "I guess it's mergeable - but we merged in something recently",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:46:22+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "f9e311f201e94f1ea222e581d9c9cb34",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "you know, a better procedure for draft BIP's might be to have a placeholder link in bitcoin/bips pointing to the authors' presonal repo...",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:46:22+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "4d5f4d853cd7448584b6aa958c280c14",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "#action Merge BIPs PRs #245 and #248",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:46:26+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "0cec2eb2b33f4331819403bbc6e8e54d",
      "sender": "Luke-Jr",
      "payload": "CodeShark: rebasing for no reason whatsoever is just annoying :/",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:47:00+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "0686d206896645c096a1bd83dbac4b8e",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "ok, I see there are no conflicts",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:47:17+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "f5599405af564d788aafce27204a3dc3",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "btcdrak: specifically, I changed a couple things in the Retroactive Invalidation section that got merged but it does not conflict with your PR",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:47:35+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "7ac1e46717424b6991d60f6ad11562b3",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "sipa: in your view, what remains for the implementations to get merged?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:48:03+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "1fac527c3c2b45a386ccfec83f03c205",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "### 10 minutes left. are there any other topic suggestions?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:49:46+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "97d22e50d58c4213830d1ab7baa84e52",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "btcdrak: rbf",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:50:01+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "e840a009d1074622bbe95fd949867702",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "ok then let's end this topic",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:50:28+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "c99c9ae86cad4973931b5b19c66d0903",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "#topic RBF",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:50:32+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "a25a74685e484da8a7ab3e92d10d2d66",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "petertodd: please go ahead",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:50:57+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "f56c5da1e68445b782f0ce092cd3195c",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "so, I've been running RBF nodes with the mempool limiter turned way down to stress test... and no issues reported",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:51:00+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "339192d742624a6487c9e56f6e860060",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "anyone have a topic that pays a higher fee? :)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:51:04+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "fa18e5e547f2469bac7dbd057e9dee18",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "CodeShark: lol",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:51:13+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "293fda94e6b34efaacde5b01d5dd1270",
      "sender": "Luke-Jr",
      "payload": "this fee is too low, I'm leaving early!",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:51:31+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "4880c39e2dfd4c7d86f1aa890274a198",
      "sender": "Luke-Jr",
      "payload": ":P",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:51:34+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "d734abfe516444f9967840aac0f7fef5",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "Luke-Jr: here's a (non)-alcoholic beverage of your choice",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:51:50+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "9bbd2b9b057749d3845d01116faf4006",
      "sender": "Luke-Jr",
      "payload": "petertodd: is the current PR easy to merge FSS and full-unconditional on top of as options?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:52:40+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "2d0bd8ce312a492798220152afdc6885",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "Luke-Jr: sure is, and I invite people to do exacty that",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:52:54+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "4443e5014ba4422ab0375810c71bc366",
      "sender": "sipa",
      "payload": "petertodd: sorry, haven't reviewed it... we have a bit of more urgent changes to make still",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:53:29+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "8e8c993b98354401a3dc285cdbcbab5b",
      "sender": "CodeShark",
      "payload": "I haven't had a chance to review your stuff yet, petertodd, but strongly support the effort ;)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:53:30+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "f1c6d677929f498e858a8eda1c6f28ff",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "cool, reviews so this can get into v0.12.0 much appreciated...",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:53:59+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "d4fa7344a1e542518b9307cee2348b01",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "RBF is another PR which seems to have a ton of support and ACKs iirc.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:54:03+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "bc78de6e7cbf403fa7b99a33225dfade",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "btcdrak: note, concept acks and utacks, not much full acks",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:54:17+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "8e663aa74a99427297fe8d5fab372b19",
      "sender": "jtimon",
      "payload": "btcdrak: totally agree on bip68, if it's going to survive longer as unmerged we should condider separate releases ala eternal petertodd's RBF instead of just an eternal PR",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:54:18+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "aeb25b6b49134b59a7884631b20c4cb0",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "jtimon: rbf works as a separate release, bip68 doesn't",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:54:49+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "8a39c7f94b224f109a8d5105a4372fc1",
      "sender": "Luke-Jr",
      "payload": "it would be nice if bitcoin.org and similar sites were designed to convey multiple Core-based branches/releases",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:55:33+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "abdde4ed918f4756b1d5f0d88e7db158",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "iirc from the previous meetings RBF is scheduled for 0.12 anyhow.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:55:36+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "2b56516f57304d42b8497031395aa849",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "any action points petertodd?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:55:40+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "81d59474831d45409f73b69c88bbae22",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "### 5 minutes remaining",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:55:56+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "43ca28ba62164ee7b47c34ebb6a1731c",
      "sender": "jtimon",
      "payload": "petertodd: it could be implemented, I'm just pointing out how unfortunate would be to require that unnecesary additional work",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:55:57+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "a2be06ec504a4b01af3595de4cc4f1e2",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "#action another one or two ACKS on opt-in RBF",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:55:59+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "23800998a4934b6493342327b48b5d6d",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "what's the PR link again?",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:56:23+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "e1c419d5d4244e67a3e13fe7b8dc74c0",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "btcdrak: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6871",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:56:30+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "5d64486c935b46dcba71c48ad803d41c",
      "sender": "jtimon",
      "payload": "petertodd: I always celebrated all RBF releases, and at the same time lament them",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:56:48+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "ffa0f67571774a67b12d489a343abb23",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "#action test and ACK RBF https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6871",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:56:49+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "adb7563f82704e3fa04829722bddb0b8",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "jtimon: separate RBF releases do help make the point that the Bitcoin Core devs do not have absolute control of Bitcoin",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:57:30+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "c97f515d9b054bc79c0f8ac65139f422",
      "sender": "Luke-Jr",
      "payload": "^ moving away from a single master branch would make that point better",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:58:05+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "4ad5af65c2004dae9af16fac0c39ca6a",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "Luke-Jr: we did that already, github.com/bitcoin and github.com/bitcoinxt :)",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:58:26+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "6503e7cd2acb498386f6d928d5f604cd",
      "sender": "Luke-Jr",
      "payload": "but that will take some changes to be practical long-term",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:58:27+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "8763ebc1bcf24231ae9c80ddcb48dbd1",
      "sender": "Luke-Jr",
      "payload": "petertodd: the latter isn't Bitcoin so not really",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:58:40+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "96b7f1e625df4ec38bfa37b433fadd07",
      "sender": "Luke-Jr",
      "payload": "petertodd: LJR is a better example there, but suffers from the rebase-abuse issue ;P",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:58:59+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "7654cc17c5204eb1ace6c0891c40bbd4",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "Luke-Jr: yeah, it's a pity that had to happen with a protocol change too, confuses the issue",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:59:08+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "c62cb26630494ae28c861653cded01a0",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "inb4 everyone shills their own fork btcdrak addrindex fork for example...",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:59:14+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "6da4c1c86b2e4f79835547596e17b0f7",
      "sender": "jtimon",
      "payload": "petertodd: absolutely, please help me document it as an example in bip99, even if it's just as an example of software fork vs consensus fork",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:59:58+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "1a416bcc69f84491bff708d029346a29",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "time is up.",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T20:00:04+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "0c4d33fbda014fba8c43741cc62bffa3",
      "sender": "Luke-Jr",
      "payload": "ttyl, going to join family",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T20:00:14+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "5452af85863e4787a93f213f2a0421b6",
      "sender": "petertodd",
      "payload": "Luke-Jr: have fun!",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T20:00:20+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "a10dcfff288548048e3fce44014fb0dd",
      "sender": "btcdrak",
      "payload": "#endmeeting",
      "action": false,
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T20:00:24+00:00"
    }
  ],
  "events": [
    {
      "event_type": "START_MEETING",
      "message": {
        "id": "4f7cd5474cdf458c92416d541a61ae45",
        "sender": "btcdrak",
        "payload": "#startmeeting",
        "action": false,
        "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:24:40+00:00"
      },
      "operand": null,
      "id": "4f7cd5474cdf458c92416d541a61ae45",
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:24:40+00:00"
    },
    {
      "event_type": "TOPIC",
      "message": {
        "id": "8c1460fec95c4738930a9406639e2808",
        "sender": "btcdrak",
        "payload": "#topic CLTV activation",
        "action": false,
        "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:24:58+00:00"
      },
      "operand": "CLTV activation",
      "id": "8c1460fec95c4738930a9406639e2808",
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:24:58+00:00"
    },
    {
      "event_type": "ACTION",
      "message": {
        "id": "6f51aa5862d640089f015b176b01e10e",
        "sender": "btcdrak",
        "payload": "#action Post reminder about CLTV deployment next week on social media",
        "action": false,
        "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:28:39+00:00"
      },
      "operand": "Post reminder about CLTV deployment next week on social media",
      "id": "6f51aa5862d640089f015b176b01e10e",
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:28:39+00:00"
    },
    {
      "event_type": "TOPIC",
      "message": {
        "id": "097f166c24504f97899833aa4854b689",
        "sender": "btcdrak",
        "payload": "#topic BIP68/BIP112 implementation",
        "action": false,
        "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:30:21+00:00"
      },
      "operand": "BIP68/BIP112 implementation",
      "id": "097f166c24504f97899833aa4854b689",
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:30:21+00:00"
    },
    {
      "event_type": "LINK",
      "message": {
        "id": "2cebc8de79c14ca4a0cd9b0d62fa34ce",
        "sender": "btcdrak",
        "payload": "#link BIP68 text https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/245",
        "action": false,
        "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:32:13+00:00"
      },
      "operand": "BIP68 text https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/245",
      "id": "2cebc8de79c14ca4a0cd9b0d62fa34ce",
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:32:13+00:00"
    },
    {
      "event_type": "LINK",
      "message": {
        "id": "915e492728f04385a889c0fdfbcc398d",
        "sender": "btcdrak",
        "payload": "#link BIP112 text https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/248",
        "action": false,
        "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:32:27+00:00"
      },
      "operand": "BIP112 text https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/248",
      "id": "915e492728f04385a889c0fdfbcc398d",
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:32:27+00:00"
    },
    {
      "event_type": "LINK",
      "message": {
        "id": "39ea387c9c9b4298ae2e4290758a05af",
        "sender": "btcdrak",
        "payload": "#link http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-November/011801.html",
        "action": false,
        "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:33:51+00:00"
      },
      "operand": "http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-November/011801.html",
      "id": "39ea387c9c9b4298ae2e4290758a05af",
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:33:51+00:00"
    },
    {
      "event_type": "ACTION",
      "message": {
        "id": "4d5f4d853cd7448584b6aa958c280c14",
        "sender": "btcdrak",
        "payload": "#action Merge BIPs PRs #245 and #248",
        "action": false,
        "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:46:26+00:00"
      },
      "operand": "Merge BIPs PRs #245 and #248",
      "id": "4d5f4d853cd7448584b6aa958c280c14",
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:46:26+00:00"
    },
    {
      "event_type": "TOPIC",
      "message": {
        "id": "c99c9ae86cad4973931b5b19c66d0903",
        "sender": "btcdrak",
        "payload": "#topic RBF",
        "action": false,
        "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:50:32+00:00"
      },
      "operand": "RBF",
      "id": "c99c9ae86cad4973931b5b19c66d0903",
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:50:32+00:00"
    },
    {
      "event_type": "ACTION",
      "message": {
        "id": "a2be06ec504a4b01af3595de4cc4f1e2",
        "sender": "petertodd",
        "payload": "#action another one or two ACKS on opt-in RBF",
        "action": false,
        "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:55:59+00:00"
      },
      "operand": "another one or two ACKS on opt-in RBF",
      "id": "a2be06ec504a4b01af3595de4cc4f1e2",
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:55:59+00:00"
    },
    {
      "event_type": "ACTION",
      "message": {
        "id": "ffa0f67571774a67b12d489a343abb23",
        "sender": "btcdrak",
        "payload": "#action test and ACK RBF https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6871",
        "action": false,
        "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:56:49+00:00"
      },
      "operand": "test and ACK RBF https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6871",
      "id": "ffa0f67571774a67b12d489a343abb23",
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T19:56:49+00:00"
    },
    {
      "event_type": "END_MEETING",
      "message": {
        "id": "a10dcfff288548048e3fce44014fb0dd",
        "sender": "btcdrak",
        "payload": "#endmeeting",
        "action": false,
        "timestamp": "2015-11-26T20:00:24+00:00"
      },
      "operand": null,
      "id": "a10dcfff288548048e3fce44014fb0dd",
      "timestamp": "2015-11-26T20:00:24+00:00"
    }
  ],
  "aliases": {},
  "vote_in_progress": false,
  "motion_index": null
}